Decision of Judge Lebedeff dated May 28, 2002
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY: I.A.S. PART 8
-------------------------------------------------------------------x
SAMUEL H. SLOAN,
Petitioner,
For a Judgment Pursuant to CPLR Article 78,
-against-
Index No. 123003/01
Mot. Seq. No. 002
NEW YORK CITY TAXI AND LIMOUSINE
COMMISSION,
Respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------------------x
DIANE A. LEBEDEFF, J.:
By the within contempt motion, petitioner Samuel H. Sloan, pro se, addresses certain issues left unresolved by the decision of February 27, 2002. Following a review of the papers now submitted, and consistent with directions issued on the record on May 14, 2002, the court determines as follows:
1. The agency has determined that it will respond to the FOIL request; in this posture, the FOIL branch of the petition is premature and is severed and dismissed.
2. The agency has determined that it did receive, and rule upon, the administrative appeal regarding the TLC summons, but the decision was mailed to Mr. Sloan's former address; the agency is directed to serve a copy of the appeals decision upon Mr. Sloan at his current address forthwith. Mr. Sloan may then take such new legal action as is appropriate. Accordingly, the reference to a Special Referee is vacated as moot. Further, given that this issue is unresolved, the claim for a refund of the fine and related damages is severed and dismissed without prejudice to being raised anew in relation to any further challenge to the adjudication. The substantive and damages branch of the petition are severed and dismissed.
3. As to the "for hire" license, which has been suspended again, the agency is directed to reinstate such license forthwith, without prejudice to noticing the matter for hearing.
4. As to the application for a new hack license, the agency is directed to schedule a hearing forthwith, with such hearing to be held in the near future. Mr. Sloan is entitled, if such answer is truthful, to aver that he has no copies of the papers requested and the matter should proceed to a hearing.
5. As to the request to find the agency in contempt, the court does not find a willful contempt has been established at this time, especially given that the agency has steadily worked upon - and resolved - many of the points at issue. The purpose of contempt proceedings is to uphold the power of the court and to secure the aggrieved party the rights by it awarded (Bessette v. WB. Conkey Co., 194 U.S. 3 24 [1904]), but the right to use contempt as a sanction must be clear (In re Battista's Estate, 176 Misc. 85 [Surrogate Ct. Kings Co. 1941]). "Guilt arises only where the authority of the court is flouted" (Spector v. Allen, 281 N.Y. 251, 260 [1939]).
6. To the extent other points are raised, the court does not find such points within the scope of this proceeding and they are denied.
This decision constitutes the order of the court.
Dated: May 28, 2002
____________________________
J. S. C.
UPDATE: This decision has been published in the New York Law Journal under Decisions of Interest". Here is the full text of the decision as published in the New York Law Journal..
Here are links: - Great Day in Court
- Decision of Judge Lebedeff dated May 28, 2002
- Supplemental Affidavit in Sloan vs. TLC
- Letter from TLC dated June 24, 2002
- Decision on Appeal from ALJ Michelle Manzione
- Peter Mazer, General Counsel of TLC
- Reply of Sam Sloan to the Response of the TLC
- Reply of Sam Sloan to the Response of the TLC
- Response of the TLC to Order to Show Cause
- A Hearing has been set in the Case of Sloan vs. TLC
- Order to Show Cause why the TLC should not be held in Contempt
- July, 2001 Decision of the TLC I did not receive until May, 2002
- Appeal from Order denying Motion to Vacate
- Affidavit in Support of Motion to Vacate
- Petition to Rehear Motion to Vacate Motion to Vacate
- Complaint to the Disciplinary Committee of the New York State Bar against Michelle Manzione
- Famous People who have Ridden in My Taxi
- Letter to Marc Hardekopf regarding TLC Appeal
- Petition to hold the TLC in Contempt
- TLC still refuses to obey court order
- Sam Sloan has filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court against Mayor Rudy Giuliani and the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission.
- Order to Show Cause
- "Notice of Claim"
- Notice of Intent to file Suit Against NYC Taxi and Limousine Commissioners
- Verified Answer of the TLC
- Sam Sloan has won his court case against the TLC
- The decision published in the New York Law Journal under Decisions of Interest" (Registration Required)
- Full text of the decision as published in the New York Law Journal
- Summary of the Case as Published in the New York Law Journal
- New York State Attorney Inquiry
- Smith vs. McGrath-McKechnie Memorandum of Law
- Smith vs. McGrath-McKechnie Reply Brief
- Dan Ackman, Taxi Driver's Lawyer, Home Page
- Driving My Taxi into the 21st Century: New Edition
- Driving My Taxi on June 17, 2000
- I'm Back in My Taxi Again
- Invitation to Liam
- Call Me Ismail!
- John F. Kennedy Junior rode in my taxi
- Driving My Taxi into the 21st Century
- Master Cabbie Taxi Academy
- Driving in New York City
- Test of Street Names in New York City
- So, you want to be a Taxi Driver in New York City
- La Guardia International Airport to be renamed Giuliani International Airport
- Takeoffs on Sam Sloan
- Scientists Prove: Taxi Drivers have larger brains than average
- Crackdown on Cabdrivers Could Backfire, Critics Warn
- U.S. Appeals Court Backs NYC Plan to Curb Sex Businesses
- NYC Cabbies: Reckless Menaces or Exploited Victims?
- Mayor Giuliani Declares War on New York City Taxi Drivers
- Giuliani Threatens Action If Cabbies Fail to Cancel a Protest
- NYC Column: India, Cabbies and Giuliani Are All Going Nuclear
- Wanted for Kidnapping
- The Slave Children of Thomas Jefferson
- Order "The Slave Children of Thomas Jefferson" by Sam Sloan, from Amazon Books
- Order "The Slave Children of Thomas Jefferson" from Barnes and Noble
My Home PageContact address - please send e-mail to the following address: Sloan@ishipress.com